And Nobody Even Supects!
Here is a tweet that caught my eye! A successful click bait I suppose. As you can see, there has been an announcement that the UK is now about to run a HUMAN experiment on the effects of Covid19 and the vaccine used to treat it. Here is the article in ScienceMag giving further details.
Some are saying that the administration of the vaccine is a human experiment in all but name, the argument being vaccines historically take years to develop successfully, given all the trial, tests and observations needed to ensure safety. There is no doubt ,though, that this whole pandemic scenario has an experimental feel to it, what with the continually moving goalposts and various ‘experts’ flip flopping from one opinion to a diametrically opposed one. And all saying the science backs them up.
Science has a bit of a bad name lately.
Which is the more reasonable approach a society might take in the outbreak of a pandemic:
Quarantine the sick, and take reasonable precautions to stop those who are identified as vulnerable from contracting the illness.
Attempt to “control the virus” by preventing millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people. (herd immunity)
To any society prior to 2020, it would have been obvious that the first approach is not only logical and proportionate, but the one least likely to have unintended and destructive consequences. However many in our society not only believe that the answer is the second, but they somehow believe it to be based on some ‘settled’ science. (Settled science is code for Do Not Question It).
I understand that many who support Lock-down will object the outline of their position. They will say that it is deliberately misleading, since it talks about healthy people, and does not mention the sick. Such objections flounder on an important fact: Lockdowns are, by their nature, an entirely untargeted and indiscriminate approach to a health issue, and the prohibiting by law of millions of healthy people from having contact with other healthy people is a feature, not an error or oversight that was/is both untried and untested, before it was first implemented by the Chinese Communist Party in January last year, and then copied by many Governments around the world, including ours, thereafter.
For some reason, many Lock-down advocates seem to think that the onus is on Lock-down opponents to disprove their position. But as Dr Malcolm Kendrick points out this is the opposite of how things are supposed to work:
“The starting point, for any scientific hypothesis, is for the proponents to disprove the null hypothesis. Demanding that those who believe something may not work, to prove that it doesn’t, is to turn the scientific method upside down. You can never prove a negative.”
The full article is here Even so, he goes on to point out that most of the countries with the highest deaths per million are those which had fairly stringent Lock-downs, and therefore the data so far most certainly does not show that Lock-downs are effective, even on their own terms. Of course, Covid Logic has an answer to this, which is that these Lock-downs weren’t real Lock downs. (A bit like when Marxists say the USSR wasn’t real communism, when pressed into an uncomfortable debating position) They were too little, too late, too soft, too weak, too short, too small, too… But they can never be wrong. Low death rates show they work. High death rates show they would have worked if only people hadn’t been bad.
But the main point is that they are not something that has been proposed, studied or trialled before, but are an entirely new practice, foisted upon the world for the first time in 2020.
Which means what? It means that they are an experiment in real time! It means that our society (along with many others) has for the last year, and continues to be for the foreseeable future, subject to an experiment.
In fact, it’s the largest psychological, social and medical theory experiment ever conducted.
This sort of language tends to meet the following response: “So are you saying it’s all a mass conspiracy? Who’s the puppet-master then?” But this is disingenuous. It doesn’t need some Dark Lord sitting over all of it in order to be an experiment, although it has to be said that the likes of Claus Schwab and Bill Gates do seem pretty good candidates. No, it simply is by definition a psychological, social, medical and economic experiment by the very nature of the fact that the mass quarantining and mass masking of millions of people, which cannot fail to change the psychology, society, biology and economy, are untried, untested methods, based merely on hypothesis, and not on hard data. In fact, the data is still coming in from this enormous experiment. Dr Kendrick says, it doesn’t actually look good for the hypothesis:
“…I would conclude that the observational studies had – thus far – failed to disprove the null hypothesis. In fact, the evidence up to this point could suggest that lockdowns may actually increase the death rate.”
Pretty damning stuff!
We have now moved on to the medical phase of experimentation, by which I mean the giving of ‘vaccines’ to millions of people (because they don’t actually stop people getting the virus, and it is not yet known whether they can prevent transmission).
If you look at the Pfizer BioNTech SE Clinical Study Trial on the US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials database, you will notice that the Estimated Study Completion Date is on January 31st 2023. In two years time!
“the date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events.”
In other words, the medium to long-term side effects of this product cannot possibly be known, because the study is still ongoing. As Prof Sucharit Bachdi said in this interview: every single person now getting these jabs is effectively an blind test subject in the largest medical experiment ever carried out.
Simply put, neither those administering these jabs nor those receiving them can have any idea of the potential medium to long-term consequences of these things, because the companies producing them have not completed the studies on them. And no, it is not the mark of an anti-vaxxer to be deeply concerned about this (I am not); it is just the mark of having one’s critical faculties in working order and of caring about what is being done to people.
In summary, both Lock-downs and the ‘vaccines’ are a mass experiment on humanity. The mid to long-term consequences of both are entirely unknown.
Future generations will marvel at how the authorities were able to do this, but they will marvel even more at how millions of people complied without much thought. This cannot end well.
We need to take a long hard look at what we are doing, and allowing to be done to us. Urgently.
Main image: Alexas Fotos